measurement guide

What a bufferbloat speed test measures

A speed test usually tells you how much data can move. A bufferbloat test asks the next question: does the connection stay usable while that data is moving? Bufferbloat.org measures capacity, quiet-line delay, delay while the line is busy, and how far the high-delay samples move away from normal.

Run the bufferbloat testFree, open source, no ads.

The short version

A throughput-only speed test can say the line is large. A quiet ping test can say the line is quick when almost nothing is happening. A bufferbloat test checks the behavior people actually feel: whether the connection keeps responding while download and upload traffic are active.

The signals in the scorecard

What turns those numbers into a bufferbloat result

The core bufferbloat signal is the difference between quiet-line latency and loaded latency. If ping stays close to normal while the test is downloading and uploading, the connection is behaving well under pressure. If ping rises sharply, queues are probably adding delay.

Throughput still matters for some uses, especially streaming and large transfers, but low throughput alone is not bufferbloat. A slower connection can still feel good if latency stays stable. A fast connection can feel bad if latency jumps whenever the line is busy.

Why p95 spread is included

Two connections can have the same median ping and still feel different. The one with a lower upper-end spread is usually easier for calls, games, and remote work to handle. That is why the scorecard includes p95 spread as a supporting signal for application performance.

Bufferbloat.org uses the plain term latency spread because browser tests and network tools may calculate jitter differently. The current method uses 95th percentile ping minus median ping so the scorecard captures bad-but-representative moments without treating one isolated spike as the whole result. The reasoning is explained in why we use latency spread, not jitter.

What this test does not measure

This is a short browser test, not a full network audit. It does not prove long-term uptime, diagnose Wi-Fi interference by itself, map every ISP routing problem, or replace sustained packet-loss testing. If a result looks surprising, run the test again and compare.

Why the test is open

Bufferbloat is easy to miss because it can hide behind good-looking speed-test numbers. A test built to expose it should be inspectable: the code, methodology, and limitations should be public so the result can be checked, debated, and improved.

try the measurement

See what happens when your own line gets busy.

Run the browser test to compare quiet-line ping with download and upload load. The scorecard shows the measured trace, application performance, and exportable technical details.